On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 02:34:49PM -0800, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> I mentioned last year that I wanted to start working on parallelism:
>
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Parallel_Query_Execution
>
> I believe it is time to start adding parallel execution to the backend.
> We already have some parallelism in the backend:
> effective_io_concurrency and helper processes. I think it is time we
> start to consider additional options
>
> Parallelism isn't going to help all queries, in fact it might be just a
> small subset, but it will be the larger queries. The pg_upgrade
> parallelism only helps clusters with multiple databases or tablespaces,
> but the improvements are significant.
>
>
> I just got out of a meeting that included Oracle Spatial folks, who
> were boasting of big performance increases in enabling parallel query
> on their spatial queries. Basically the workloads on things like big
> spatial joins are entirely CPU bound, so they are seeing that adding
> 15 processors makes things 15x faster. Spatial folks would love love
> love to see parallel query execution.
I added PostGIS under the "Expensive Functions" opportunity:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Parallel_Query_Execution#Specific_Opportunities
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
