On 01/16/2013 12:20 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 09:05:39AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 01/15/2013 11:32 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 01:28:18PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote:
Claudio, Stephen,
It really seems like the areas where we could get the most "bang for the
buck" in parallelism would be:
1. Parallel sort
2. Parallel aggregation (for commutative aggregates)
3. Parallel nested loop join (especially for expression joins, like GIS)
parallel data load? :/
We have that in pg_restore, and I thinnk we are getting parallel dump in
9.3, right? Unfortunately, I don't see it in the last 9.3 commit-fest.
Is it still being worked on?
I am about half way through reviewing it. Unfortunately paid work
take precedence over unpaid work.
Do you think it will make it into 9.3?
Yes, I hope it will.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
