On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakan...@vmware.com> wrote: > It makes me uncomfortable that we're adding switches to pg_ctl promote just > because we're worried there might be bugs in our code. If we don't trust the > code as it is, it needs more testing. We can analyze the code more > thoroughly, to make an educated guess on what's likely to happen if it's > broken, and consider adding some sanity checks etc. to make the consequences > less severe. We should not put the burden on our users to decide if the code > is trustworthy enough to use.
+1 -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
