On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> Wait, I'm confused. I had a note to myself to come back and review >> this, but now that I look at it, I didn't think that patch was pending >> review. Alvaro, Tom, and I all made comments that seems to impinge >> upon that design rather heavily. No? > > The current design follows exactly your comments and design requests. > Tom and Álvaro comments are the ones you did answer to saying that it's > not 9.3 material, but next release at best, subject to heavy refactoring. > > What did I miss?
Well, there's this, upon which we surely have not achieved consensus: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ca+tgmobq6ngsxguihwqcygf0q+7y9zhnerepo3s1vswkknw...@mail.gmail.com And then Tom also wrote this, which is kind of a good point, too: > Well, a list of object OIDs is of exactly zero use once the command > has been carried out. So I don't think that that represents a useful > or even very testable feature on its own, if there's no provision to > fire user code while the OIDs are still in the catalogs. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
