On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:

> There are also weird edge cases here when the server is promoted.  The
> recovery.conf file won't exist any more, but the GUC settings changes
> it contains will live on until the next SIGHUP.
>
Yes indeed, I forgot that.

The proposal Greg Smith floated previously, which I supported and I
> believe others did as well, was to convert the parameters to GUCs, and
> error out if recovery.conf existed.  That way, anyone who is doing it
> wrong (for the new release), gets a clear error message.  If we were
> doing that (and I had somehow thought THAT was the consensus), then
> this patch is moot, because you can't set a location for recovery.conf
> if that concept doesn't exist any more.  You might need a parameter to
> set the location for the trigger file, perhaps.
>
I am perfectly fine with this plan, especially the part where server errors
out if recovery.conf is found. It makes clear to the user that it is not
supported
anymore.

I just tried to find some new fresh ideas that would satisfy everybody... So
let's keep up with the plan that Greg proposed and forget what I wrote
previously.
-- 
Michael

Reply via email to