> We already have the ability to define lower bounds other than 1 on > arrays, and it would be inconsistent to allow that for arrays with > elements, but not for arrays without. I could imagine somebody > wanting to create an empty zero-based array, and then iteratively > append elements to it.
Hmmm. You know, I think that's why we originally had array_upper() on an empty array return NULL, not 0. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
