On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:31:51PM +0100, anara...@anarazel.de wrote:
> Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> schrieb:
> >Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> >> Should I just patch pg_upgrade to remove the "indisvalid", skip
> >> "indisvalid" indexes, and backpatch it?  Users should be using the
> >> version of pg_upgrade to match new pg_dump.  Is there any case where
> >> they don't match?  Do I still need to check for "indisready"?
> >
> >Yeah, if you can just ignore !indisvalid indexes that should work fine.
> >I see no need to look at indisready if you're doing that.
> You need to look at inisready in 9.2 since thats used for about to be dropped 
> indexes. No?

Well, if it is dropped, pg_dump will not dump it.  At this point though,
pg_upgrade is either running in check mode, or it is the only user.  I
think we are OK.

  Bruce Momjian  <br...@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to