"anara...@anarazel.de" <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> schrieb: >> Yeah, if you can just ignore !indisvalid indexes that should work fine. >> I see no need to look at indisready if you're doing that.
> You need to look at inisready in 9.2 since thats used for about to be dropped > indexes. No? No, he doesn't need to look at indisready/indislive; if either of those flags are off then indisvalid should certainly be off too. (If it isn't, queries against the table are already in trouble.) regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers