"anara...@anarazel.de" <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> schrieb:
>> Yeah, if you can just ignore !indisvalid indexes that should work fine.
>> I see no need to look at indisready if you're doing that.

> You need to look at inisready in 9.2 since thats used for about to be dropped 
> indexes. No?

No, he doesn't need to look at indisready/indislive; if either of those
flags are off then indisvalid should certainly be off too.  (If it
isn't, queries against the table are already in trouble.)

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to