On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> It seems a bad idea to backpatch this; whoever wants this functionality >> in back branches should probably run a patched server. > > Surely this is 9.4 material at this point in any case.
I don't know why this couldn't be slipped into 9.3; we have done worse later. But I don't have a personal stake in it either, and will certainly defer to whatever the consensus is. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
