Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think I've heard of scripts grepping the output of pg_controldata for
>> this that or the other. Any rewording of the labels would break that.
>> While I'm not opposed to improving the labels, I would vote against your
>> second, abbreviated scheme because it would make things ambiguous for
>> simple grep-based scripts.
> We could provide two alternative outputs, one for human consumption with
> the proposed format and something else that uses, say, shell assignment
> syntax. (I did propose this years ago and I might have an unfinished
> patch still lingering about somewhere.)
And a script would use that how? "pg_controldata --machine-friendly"
would fail outright on older versions. I think it's okay to ask script
writers to write
pg_controldata | grep -e 'old label|new label'
but not okay to ask them to deal with anything as complicated as trying
a switch to see if it works or not.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
