On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 13:20 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Hmm. Rereading your last email, I see your point: since we now have
> HEAP_XLOG_VISIBLE, this is much less of an issue than it would have
> been before. I'm still not convinced that simplifying that code is a
> good idea, but maybe it doesn't really hurt us much in practice.
Given that there's not a big impact one way or another, I don't mind
whether this particular patch is committed or not. Whichever you think
is more understandable and safer at this late hour. Also, to be clear,
the fact that I posted a patch was not meant to advocate either way;
merely to present the options.
Not sure exactly what you mean about the code simplification, but I
agree that anything more substantial than this patch should be left for
9.4.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
