Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2013-05-13 14:48:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>>> DROPing and recreating a new index in --single mode isn't that
>>> uncommon...

>> Surely you'd just REINDEX it instead.  Moreover, if it isn't a system
>> index already, why are you doing this in --single mode at all?

> The last case I had was that an index was corrupted in a way that
> autovacuum got stuck on the corrupt index and wasn't killable. Without
> single mode it was hard to be fast enough to drop the index before
> autovac grabbed the lock again.

Meh.  Actually, after looking closer at xlog.c, the OID counter starts
out at FirstBootstrapObjectId, which is not what I'd been thinking.
So a value less than that must indicate wraparound, which presumably
never happens during initdb.  We could just change the code to

            if (ShmemVariableCache->nextOid < ((Oid) FirstBootstrapObjectId))
            {
                /* wraparound while in standalone environment */
                ShmemVariableCache->nextOid = FirstNormalObjectId;
                ShmemVariableCache->oidCount = 0;
            }

which is a bit asymmetric-looking but should do the right thing in all
cases.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to