On 20 May 2013 20:06, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakan...@vmware.com> wrote:
>> It would be possible to redesign this with a special new reason, or we >> could just use "time" as the reason, or we could just leave it. >> >> Do nothing is easy, though so are the others, so we can choose >> anything we want. What do we want it to say? > > > I'm not sure. Perhaps we should print "(no flags)", so that it wouldn't look > like there's something missing in the log message. The reason text would still be absent, so it wouldn't really help the user interpret the log message correctly. I suggest we use RequestCheckpoint(CHECKPOINT_CAUSE_TIME) instead, since it is literally time for a checkpoint. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
