On 21 May 2013 15:29, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Or, what about using CHECKPOINT_FORCE and just printing "force"?
> Currently that checkpoint always starts because of existence of the
> end-of-recovery record, but I think we should ensure that the checkpoint
> always starts by using that flag.

This would mean we can't use the secondary checkpoint record, but we
already gave that up so should be OK.

Three people, three suggestions; so I will agree to this suggestion so
we can get on with it.

 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to