On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > Really? I though vacuum held onto its locks until it reached > vacuum_cost. If it doesn't, then maybe we should adjust the default for > vacuum_cost_limit upwards.
That would be completely insane. Or in other words, no, it doesn't do anything like that. :-) -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
