On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Pavel Raiskup <prais...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, June 04, 2013 05:28:09 PM Pavel Raiskup wrote: >> Hi, I was asked [1] to add following patch downstream, could it be >> considered upstream also? Thanks, Pavel. >> >> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970661 > > Oh, I see now it was already consulted here: > > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1368448758.23422.12.ca...@t520.redhat.com > > Sorry for noise, it can be discussed there.
I think we should go ahead and commit this patch, or some variant of it. Having a buildfarm machine would be good... but I don't think that should be a prerequisite for this sort of support. We certainly have spinlock support for other platforms for which we don't have buildfarm machines. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
