On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Stephen Frost <[email protected]> wrote:
> Having a schema that isn't pg_catalog doesn't necessairly mean we need a
> schema per extension. Just a 'pg_extensions' schema, which is added to
> search_path behind the scenes (just like pg_catalog..) would be better
> than having everything go into pg_catalog.
Well no objection here. That's just like having /usr/local/{lib,bin,etc}.
> I'd prefer that we let the
> admins control both where extensions get installed to and what schemas
> are added to the end of the search_path.
This I object to. That's like having /usr/local/{apache,pgsql,kde,gnome}/bin.
--
greg
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
