> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Tatsuo Ishii <is...@postgresql.org> wrote: >>> Recently we got a complain about server side large object function >>> names described in the doc: >>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/51b2413f.8010...@gmail.com >>> >>> In the doc: >>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/lo-funcs.html >>> >>> "There are server-side functions callable from SQL that correspond to >>> each of the client-side functions described above; indeed, for the >>> most part the client-side functions are simply interfaces to the >>> equivalent server-side functions" >>> >>>>From the description it is hard for users to find out server side >>> functions "loread" and "lowrite" becuase they are looking for >>> "lo_read" and "lo_write". So I think his complain is fair. Included >>> patches attempt to fix the problem. >> >> I have committed this. > > Did you see my email with proposed alternative text? You didn't even > fix the whitespace error I pointed out.
I don't know why but I haven't received your email. I just found the email in the web archive and it looks better than what I proposed. Do you want to commit it yourself? -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
