On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Tatsuo Ishii <is...@postgresql.org> wrote: >> Recently we got a complain about server side large object function >> names described in the doc: >> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/51b2413f.8010...@gmail.com >> >> In the doc: >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/lo-funcs.html >> >> "There are server-side functions callable from SQL that correspond to >> each of the client-side functions described above; indeed, for the >> most part the client-side functions are simply interfaces to the >> equivalent server-side functions" >> >>>From the description it is hard for users to find out server side >> functions "loread" and "lowrite" becuase they are looking for >> "lo_read" and "lo_write". So I think his complain is fair. Included >> patches attempt to fix the problem. > > I have committed this.
Did you see my email with proposed alternative text? You didn't even fix the whitespace error I pointed out. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
