> So there isn't a "fall down" thing here. We expect the recently > loaded/updated data to be scanned and that's OK. > > Having the minmax index updated greedily is just adding extra work for > fast diminishing returns. We can always add that later if really > needed, but I doubt it will be needed - in just the same way as mat > views aren't greedily updated.
Ok, in that case, can we add the patch without messing with the FSM logic? It'll work out-of-the-box for append-only tables, and that's a pretty solid use case. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
