On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 06:38:48PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > On 06/24/2013 05:37 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > >On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 09:21:26PM -0300, Claudio Freire wrote: > >>On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Joshua D. Drake <j...@commandprompt.com> > >>wrote: > >>>> > >>>>I think the big question is whether you can _control_ what C++ features > >>>>are used, or whether you are perpetually instructing users what C++ > >>>>features not to use. > >>> > >>> > >>>How is that different than us having to do the same with C? > >> > >> > >>Perhaps the size of C++ ? > > > >Right. I don't think there are any C features we want to avoid; are > >there any? > > Anything supported by C99 and not other versions I would say. > However, my point is if done correctly we would state which features > ahead of time we are willing to use and make them part of the > developer faq?
Yes, that would be the best approach. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
