On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:50:07AM -0400, Christopher Browne wrote: > b) It would be a pretty good thing to mention reviewers within commit notes; > that provides some direct trace-back as to who it was that either validated > that the change was good, or that let a bad one slip through. > > c) The release notes indicate authors of changes; to have a list of reviewers > would be a fine thing. > > If it requires inordinate effort to get the reviewers directly attached to > each > and every change, perhaps it isn't worthwhile to go to extreme efforts to that > end. > > It could be pretty satisfactory to have a simple listing, in the release > notes, > of the set of reviewers. That's a lot less bookkeeping than tracking this for > each and every change.
Adding the names to each release note item is not a problem; the problem is the volume of names that overwhelms the release note text. If we went that direction, I predict we would just remove _all_ names from the release notes. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
