On 06/27/2013 12:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:50:07AM -0400, Christopher Browne wrote:
It could be pretty satisfactory to have a simple listing, in the
release notes, of the set of reviewers. That's a lot less
bookkeeping than tracking this for each and every change.
Adding the names to each release note item is not a problem; the
problem is the volume of names that overwhelms the release note text. If
we went that direction, I predict we would just remove _all_ names from
the release notes.
Yeah. Keep in mind that the overwhelming majority of the audience for
the release notes doesn't actually give a darn who implemented what.
Maybe we should have a Kudos / Bragging rights wiki page, with a table
something like this:
Release
Feature Name
Principal Author(s)
Contributing Author(s)
Code Reviewer(s)
Tester(s)
Constructing it going backwards would be an interesting task :-)
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
