Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On 6/27/13 10:20 AM, Robert Haas wrote: >> So I'd like to endorse Josh's idea: subject to appropriate review, >> let's add these test cases. Then, if it really turns out to be too >> burdensome, we can take them out, or figure out a sensible way to >> split the suite. Pushing all of Robins work into a secondary suite, >> or throwing it out altogether, both seem to me to be things which will >> not be to the long-term benefit of the project. > > I agree. If it gets too big, let's deal with it then. But let's not > make things more complicated because they *might* get too big later.
+1 -- Kevin Grittner EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
