On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 07:49:46AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: > 2013/6/28 Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com>: > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 03:56:27PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: > >> cleaned patch is in attachment > > > > Of the five options you're adding to GET STACKED DIAGNOSTICS, four of them > > appear in the SQL standard. DATATYPE_NAME does not; I think we should call > > it > > PG_DATATYPE_NAME in line with our other extensions in this area. > > > > yes, but It should be fixed in 9.3 enhanced fields too - it should be > consistent with PostgreSQL fields
What else, specifically, should be renamed? (Alternately, would you prepare a new version of the patch incorporating the proper name changes?) Thanks, nm -- Noah Misch EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
