On 30 June 2013 02:33, Amit kapila <amit.kap...@huawei.com> wrote:

> On Sunday, June 30, 2013 11:37 AM Fabien COELHO wrote:
> >> If we had a different set of tests, that would be a valid argument.  But
> >> we don't, so it's not.  And nobody has offered to write a feature to
> >> split our tests either.
> >I have done a POC. See:
> > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1170
> I think it is better to submit for next commit fest which is at below link:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=19

- There is a certain value in having separate tests, just that for the
big-tests to be any meaningful, if the buildfarm could run on a periodic
(daily?) basis and send some kind of automated bug-reports. Without an
automatic feedback, most may not inclined to run all tests before
submitting a patch and there'd be a big pile up near a release.

- For now, the new tests that I submit for review (for next CF) would be
for 'make check', until a 'make bigcheck' or whatever is up and running.

Robins Tharakan

Reply via email to