On Monday, July 01, 2013 8:37 AM Josh Berkus wrote: On 06/30/2013 12:33 AM, Amit kapila wrote: > > On Sunday, June 30, 2013 11:37 AM Fabien COELHO wrote: >>>> If we had a different set of tests, that would be a valid argument. But >>>> we don't, so it's not. And nobody has offered to write a feature to >>>> split our tests either. > >>> I have done a POC. See: > >>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1170 > >> I think it is better to submit for next commit fest which is at below link: >> >> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=19
> I would argue for doing this in this CF, just so that we can have the > benefit of the extra tests for the next 3 months, and so that Andrew can > work on the buildfarm additions. My mail was just a suggestion, as in general after start of CF all new patch submissions for review are done in next CF. However as for this particular patch, there are quite a few other dependent patches, so it will be good if this patch gets committed in this CF only. Also as a CFM, you are better person to decide about it. With Regards, Amit Kapila. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
