On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 22:58 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I thought that Jeff withdrew this patch.
No -- was there a reason you thought that? I know it could use another
round of testing before commit, and there may be a couple other things
to clear up. But I don't want to invest a lot of time there right now,
because, as I understand it, you still object to the patch anyway.
I am still not entirely clear on the objections to this patch:
1. Contention was a concern, but I believe I have mitigated it. Strictly
speaking, additional pins may be acquired, but the cost of those pin
operations will be spread over a lot of other work.
2. There are quite a few different ideas about where we're going with
PD_ALL_VISIBLE and freezing, but it seems like removing PD_ALL_VISIBLE
is potentially compatible with most of them.
Any others?
The patch reduces code complexity and reduces writes during a data load.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
