> Folks, > > For 9.2, we adopted it as policy that anyone submitting a patch to a > commitfest is expected to review at least one patch submitted by someone > else. And that failure to do so would affect the attention your patches > received in the future. For that reason, I'm publishing the list below > of people who submitted patches and have not yet claimed any patch in > the commitfest to review. > > For those of you who are contributing patches for your company, please > let your boss know that reviewing is part of contributing, and that if > you don't do the one you may not be able to do the other. > > The two lists below, idle submitters and committers, constitutes 26 > people. This *outnumbers* the list of contributors who are busy > reviewing patches -- some of them four or more patches. If each of > these people took just *one* patch to review, it would almost entirely > clear the list of patches which do not have a reviewer. If these folks > continue not to do reviews, this commitfest will drag on for at least 2 > weeks past its closure date. > > Andrew Geirth > Nick White > Peter Eisentrout > Alexander Korotkov > Etsuro Fujita > Hari Babu > Jameison Martin > Jon Nelson > Oleg Bartunov > Chris Farmiloe > Samrat Revagade > Alexander Lakhin > Mark Kirkwood > Liming Hu > Maciej Gajewski > Josh Kuperschmidt > Mark Wong > Gurjeet Singh > Robins Tharakan > Tatsuo Ishii > Karl O Pinc
It took me for while before realizing that I am on the list because I posted this: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20130610.091605.250603479334631505.t-is...@sraoss.co.jp Because I did not register the patch into CF page myself. I should have not posted it until I find any patch which I can take care of. Sorry for this. -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
