On 6 July 2013 20:25, Robins Tharakan <thara...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Do let me know your view on this second point, so that I can remove these > tests if so required.
Hi, Please find attached the updated patch. It address the first issue regarding reducing the repeated CREATE / DROP ROLEs. It still doesn't address the excessive (syntactical) checks tough. I am still unclear as to how to identify which checks to skip. (As in, although I have a personal preference of checking everything, my question probably wasn't clear in my previous email. I was just asking 'how' to know which checks to not perform.) Should a 'syntax error' in the message be considered as an unnecessary check? If so, its easier for me to identify which checks to skip, while creating future tests. -- Robins Tharakan
regress_role_v4.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
