On 2013-07-26 08:49:38 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > OK. I've taken care of all remaining uses of SnapshotNow in the code > > base. I think we can go ahead and remove it, now. Patch attached. > > > (And there was, hopefully, much rejoicing.) > > What about SnapshotSelf?
I thought about that yesterday and I think we should replace the usages which aren't easily replaceable (constraint stuff) with an mvcc snapshot, just one treats our transaction's current CommandId as visible. That should be doable? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
