* Alvaro Herrera (alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > Andres Freund wrote: > > > Postgresql.auto.conf.d is what I'd propose, but the decision about > > that seems to be one of the smaller problems around this feature... > > That naming seems to make it sensible to extend other files (hba, > > ident) similarly at a later point. > > I don't like this particular naming proposal, but I'm glad this patch > finally seems to be getting somewhere.
Yeah, also not a fan. We don't have any 'conf.d' directories in PGDATA and I don't think we should start now. I liked Josh's suggestions of something like "system_conf". For multiple independent config files, we could use directories under that (eg: 'pgconf', 'pghba', 'pgident'..). Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature