* Andres Freund (and...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > People know what to expect from .d directories, that's why I suggested > it, don't feel really strongly about it. I dislike naming the > subdirectories pgconf/... et al though, we should reference the original > files name, instead of introducing new abbreviations.
*People* should not be messing around with files under $PGDATA- that's half the point. conf.d or other names which look like configuration directories that an admin should modify are a *bad* idea. Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature