* Andres Freund (and...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> People know what to expect from .d directories, that's why I suggested
> it, don't feel really strongly about it. I dislike naming the
> subdirectories pgconf/... et al though, we should reference the original
> files name, instead of introducing new abbreviations.

*People* should not be messing around with files under $PGDATA- that's
half the point.  conf.d or other names which look like configuration
directories that an admin should modify are a *bad* idea.

        Thanks,

                Stephen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to