On 18.8.2013 17:54, Tom Lane wrote: > > TBH this seems like way too much cruft to be added in support of what > are after all *unsupported* releases. And how far back do we stop, > anyway? > > I'd suggest you test all the branches with the newest pgbench > version that happens to work with the oldest branch you care about.
That won't give me the 9.3-only features (that I really want/need). > Having said that, it seems like (a) could be fixed with about a > one-line change, if we simply made it not add the "with > (fillfactor=%d)" clause when fillfactor was at 100. And I'm not Yeah, that seems line a nice solution - no additional option. Another solution is to use custom scripts, and only use pgbench to execute them. That'd solve the IF EXISTS problem too. > clear why (b) is a problem; libpq already takes care of suppressing > application_name when connecting to old servers. Hmmm, I'm getting this in the log (when connection to 8.0.0): FATAL: unrecognized configuration parameter "application_name" but it seems to be working. I'm wondering if FATAL is appropriate here. Tomas -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
