2013/8/23 Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> > On 08/23/2013 11:30 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > 2013/8/23 Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> > > > >> Pavel, > >> > >>> But it can have a different reason. In T-SQL (Microsoft or Sybase) or > >> MySQL > >>> a unbound query is used to direct transfer data to client side. > >> > >> Are you planning to implement that in PL/pgSQL? > >> > >> > > yes. I would to see a stored procedures with this functionality in pg > > Is there some reason we wouldn't use RETURN QUERY in that case, instead > of SELECT? As I said above, it would be more consistent with existing > PL/pgSQL. >
for example - multirecordset support. can be reason why distinguish between these syntax and these functionality. Regards Pavel > > -- > Josh Berkus > PostgreSQL Experts Inc. > http://pgexperts.com >
