On 08/29/2013 11:01 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Aug 29, 2013, at 1:11 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I cannot to say what is good design for PL/pgSQL - only I feel so some >> variant of RETURN statement is not good, because semantic is significantly >> different. And I see a increasing inconsistency between a original ADA and >> PL/pgSQL. > So YIELD or implement PL/PSM. We already have RETURN NEXT as equivalent to YIELD.
-- Hannu Krosing PostgreSQL Consultant Performance, Scalability and High Availability 2ndQuadrant Nordic OÜ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
