On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 5:17 AM, David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:29:06PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >> Hi, >> >> While looking at the pg_restore code, I noticed that while it >> supports specifying multiple --table options to restore several >> tables, it does not support multiple --function options. Or --index, >> --schema, or --trigger. >> >> The support for multiple --table options was added in 9.3, in >> January. See >> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAK3UJRG+yV1mK5twLfKVMCwXH4f6PnJou6Rn=ecabyfqh1v...@mail.gmail.com. >> Was there a particular reason for only doing it for --table, or was >> it just an oversight or lack of interest? No doubt that --table is >> the most interesting one, but IMHO the other options should behave >> the same, for the sake of consistency. > > +1 for making them consistent. There will also be an improvement in > usability. +1. It would be good to have consistency there for all the objects. -- Michael
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
