On 27.08.2013 21:56, Tom Lane wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas<hlinnakan...@vmware.com> writes:
Would anyone object to backpatching that change to 9.3 ? The risk seems
very small, and it would be good to do the other options in the same
release as --table. It was an oversight to only do it for --table in 9.3.
Assuming no objections, I'll apply the attached patch to 9.3 and master
later tonight.
I object, strongly. This is a feature addition, and has no business going
in post-rc1, especially with no time for review.
Ok.
As far as the function case goes, I'm not really thrilled about layering
more functionality on that until we've come to some understanding about
how to select from a group of overloaded functions. It may be that this
is orthogonal to that issue ... or maybe not. I don't have any objection
to fixing the non-function cases, as long as it's only in HEAD.
Huh, what's that issue?
As the code stands, you have to pass the argument types to the
--function flag, ie. --function="myfunc(integer)". It's annoyingly picky
about the spelling, as the it has to match exactly what pg_dump prints,
but it does handle selecting one function from a group of overloaded
ones. And that really is orthogonal to whether or not you can give
multiple --function arguments.
- Heikki
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
