On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Daniel Farina <dan...@fdr.io> wrote: > I remember hacking that out for testing sake. > > I can only justify it as a foot-gun to prevent someone from being > stuck restarting the database to get a reasonable number in there. > Let's CC Peter; maybe he can remember some thoughts about that.
On reflection I think it was entirely to do with the testing of the patch. I don't think that the minimum value of pg_stat_statements has any real significance. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
