Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I actually had the thought that it might be something we'd integrate > *into* initdb. So you'd do initdb --system-memory 8GB or something > like that and it would do the rest. That'd be slick, at least IMHO.
How would you handle the case that the machine (whether physical or a VM) later gets more RAM? That's certainly not unheard of with physical servers, and with VMs I'm not sure that the database server would necessarily go through a stop/start cycle for it. -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
