On 2013-10-10 12:54:23 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > On 09/19/2013 06:12 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > > > > >2013/9/16 Satoshi Nagayasu <sn...@uptime.jp <mailto:sn...@uptime.jp>> > > > > > > > > > > I'm looking at this patch, and I have a question here. > > > > Should "DROP TRIGGER IF EXISTS" ignore error for non-existing trigger > > and non-existing table? Or just only for non-existing trigger? > > > > > >My opinion is so, both variants should be ignored - it should be fully > >fault tolerant in this use case. > > > > > > > This thread seems to have gone cold, but I'm inclined to agree with Pavel. > If the table doesn't exist, neither does the trigger, and the whole point of > the 'IF EXISTS' variants is to provide the ability to issue DROP commands > that don't fail if their target is missing.
-1, this seems to likely to just hide typos. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
