Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > Our project has a serious, chronic problem with giving new > patch-submitters a bad experience, and this patch is a good > example of that.
Perhaps; but it has also been an example of the benefits of having tight review. IMO, pg_sleep_for() and pg_sleep_until() are better than the initial proposal. For one thing, since each accepts a specific type, it allows for cleaner syntax. These are not only unambiguous, they are easier to code and read than what was originally proposed: select pg_sleep_for('10 minutes'); select pg_sleep_until('tomorrow 05:00'); -- Kevin Grittner EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers