Just to be pedantic, commit message shows "support for Tru64 ended in 201."
I think you mean 2012. On 18/10/2013 13:41, "Robert Haas" <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: >> On 10/17/13 12:45 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >>> The attached patch, which I propose to apply relatively soon if nobody >>> objects, removes the IRIX port. >> >> +1 > >Done. And here's a patch for removing the alpha architecture and >Tru64 UNIX (aka OSF/1) which runs on that architecture, per discussion >upthread. Barring objections, I'll apply this next week. > >On a related note, I think we should update the paragaraph in >installation.sgml that begins "In general, PostgreSQL can be expected >to work on these CPU architectures". Any architecture that doesn't >have a buildfarm animal should be relegated to the second sentence, >which reads "Code support exists for ... but these architectures are >not known to have been tested recently." Similarly, I think the >following paragraph should be revised so that only operating systems >for which we have current buildfarm support are considered fully >supported. Others should be relegated to a sentence later in the >paragraph that says something like "code support exists but not tested >recently" or "expected to work but not tested regularly". > >-- >Robert Haas >EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com >The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company > >-- >Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) >To make changes to your subscription: >http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers