On 2013-10-21 09:15:36 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 10/21/13 1:31 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > > The point of the CF is exactly that all > > patches get at least one good round of review. Moving unreviewed patches > > to the next CF will let them just suffer the same fate there. > > What is the alternative?
I am not 100% sure, but what's the point of the CF if we're not actually reviewing patches that wouldn't get review without it? So I guess it's not starting the next one before we've finished - which we obviously haven't in this case - the last one. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
