On 2013-10-21 09:15:36 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 10/21/13 1:31 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > The point of the CF is exactly that all
> > patches get at least one good round of review. Moving unreviewed patches
> > to the next CF will let them just suffer the same fate there.
> What is the alternative?
I am not 100% sure, but what's the point of the CF if we're not actually
reviewing patches that wouldn't get review without it? So I guess it's
not starting the next one before we've finished - which we obviously
haven't in this case - the last one.
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: