On 07-11-2013 09:42, Dilip kumar wrote: Dilip, this is on my TODO for 9.4. I've already had a half-backed patch for it. Let's see what I can come up with.
> Is it required to move the common code for parallel operation of pg_dump and > vacuumdb to one place and reuse it ? > I'm not sure about that because the pg_dump parallel code is tight to TOC entry. Also, dependency matters for pg_dump while in the scripts case, an order to be choosen will be used. However, vacuumdb can share the parallel code with clusterdb and reindexdb (my patch does it). Of course, a refactor to unify parallel code (pg_dump and scripts) can be done in a separate patch. > Prototype patch is attached in the mail, please provide your > feedback/Suggestions... > I'll try to merge your patch with the one I have here until the next CF. -- Euler Taveira Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/ PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
