On 08 November 2013 03:22, Euler Taveira Wrote > On 07-11-2013 09:42, Dilip kumar wrote: > > Dilip, this is on my TODO for 9.4. I've already had a half-backed patch > for it. Let's see what I can come up with.
Ok, Let me know if I can contribute to this.. > > Is it required to move the common code for parallel operation of > pg_dump and vacuumdb to one place and reuse it ? > > > I'm not sure about that because the pg_dump parallel code is tight to > TOC entry. Also, dependency matters for pg_dump while in the scripts > case, an order to be choosen will be used. However, vacuumdb can share > the parallel code with clusterdb and reindexdb (my patch does it). +1 > > Of course, a refactor to unify parallel code (pg_dump and scripts) can > be done in a separate patch. > > > Prototype patch is attached in the mail, please provide your > feedback/Suggestions... > > > I'll try to merge your patch with the one I have here until the next CF. Regards, Dilip -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
