On 2013-11-11 12:01:40 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> >> I'm less than sure that every version of gcc will recognize %z, either
> >> ...
>
> > It's been in recognized in 2.95 afaics, so I think we're good.
Hm. Strange. Has to have been backpatched to the ancient debian I have
around. Unfortunately I can't easily "apt-get source" there...
The commit that added it to upstream is:
commit 44e9fa656d60bb19ab81d76698a61e47a4b0857c
Author: drepper <drepper@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>
Date: Mon Jan 3 21:48:49 2000 +0000
(format_char_info): Update comment. (check_format_info): Recognize 'z'
modifier in the same way 'Z' was recognized. Emit warning for formats
new in ISO C99 only if flag_isoc9x is not set.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@31188
138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
That's 3.0. Verified it in the 3.0. tarball, although I didn't compile
test it.
> We might be willing to toss 2.95 overboard by now, but we'd need to be
> sure of exactly what the new minimum usable version is.
Well, we don't even need to toss it overboard, just live with useless
warnings there since we'd translate it ourselves.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
