Kevin Grittner <kgri...@ymail.com> writes: > It does seem hard to believe that clang tools would find as enough > problems that were missed by Coverity and Valgrind to account for > all the warnings that are scrolling by; but it looks like it has > pointed out at least *one* problem that's worth fixing.
Yeah, that's the thing --- quite a lot of people have looked at Postgres with Coverity already. If Clang is throwing up lots and lots of warnings, the odds are *very* high that most of them are false positives. Running through such a list to see if there's anything real isn't all that exciting a prospect. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers