Kevin Grittner escribió: > These both seemed legitimate to me. Patch attached. Any > objections to applying it? I realize the memory leak is a tiny one > in the regression testing code, so it could never amount to enough > to matter; but it seems worth fixing just to avoid noise in code > analyzers.
We have marked a large number of memory leak reports by Coverity in initdb and other short-lived programs as false positive, on the grounds that there's no point in freeing memory in a program that's about to terminate anyway. I'm not saying I agree necessarily with that POV, but if we take that stance then there's similarly no point in fixing this leak in the regression test code, is there? -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
