On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 11/14/2013 07:02 AM, Sawada Masahiko wrote: > >> I attached patch adds new wal_level 'all'. > > > Shouldn't this be a separate setting? It's useful for storage which > requires rewriting a partially written sector before it can be read again. >
Thank you for comment. Actually, I had thought to add separate parameter. If so, this feature logs enough information with all of the wal_level (e.g., minimal) ? And I thought that relation between wal_lvel and new feature would be confuse user. Regards, ------- Sawada Masahiko -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
